An employee just reported harassment, discrimination, or a manager breaking the rules. You need to act quickly, stay fair to everyone involved, and avoid making the situation worse.
How you investigate now can decide whether a lawsuit follows and whether you can defend it. Karin Backstrom conducts impartial workplace investigations for San Diego employers and guides companies that run their own.
Request a Consultation
Tell Karin about the complaint.
Send the basics and we'll reach out to schedule your consultation.
Confidential. Reviewed personally by Karin Backstrom.
California law expects action, not silence. FEHA requires employers to take all reasonable steps to prevent discrimination and harassment. When a coworker harasses an employee, the business can be liable if it knew or should have known and failed to take immediate and appropriate corrective action.
CRD regulations describe what a proper response looks like. They call for a fair, timely, and thorough investigation by impartial, qualified personnel, with documentation, reasonable conclusions based on the evidence, and appropriate remedial steps.
A rushed or one-sided investigation can become evidence against you. That is why investigation guidance is part of Backstrom Labor Law’s legal HR counsel for California employers. If a complaint later turns into a lawsuit, a sound investigation is often the center of any harassment claim defense in San Diego.
Not every complaint needs a lawyer. Some clearly do. Use this as a starting point.
| Situation | Who should lead |
|---|---|
| Routine policy, attendance, or conduct issue | Trained in-house HR |
| Complaint against an owner, executive, or HR itself | An outside attorney or licensed investigator |
| Harassment, discrimination, or retaliation allegations that could become a claim | Attorney involvement from the start |
| The employee has a lawyer or filed with an agency | Attorney involvement from the start |
| Repeat complaints about the same manager | An outside attorney or licensed investigator |
| Reports of fraud, safety violations, or other legal violations | Attorney involvement from the start |
One trap catches many employers. California generally requires outside investigators to hold a private investigator license. Your own employees and attorneys acting as attorneys are exempt, but an outside HR consultant usually is not. When an outside attorney investigator is the right fit, Karin can take on that role.
Karin helps you decide who should investigate, what to do in the meantime, and how to protect the process from the first day.
When an attorney directs an investigation to give you legal advice, the communications and work product may be protected from disclosure. That protection can keep early, candid analysis away from the other side.
There is a trade-off. If you later defend a claim by pointing to your investigation as proof that you acted properly, California courts have found that the employer may waive privilege over that investigation. You cannot use the report as a shield and keep it hidden at the same time.
The solution is planning. Many employers separate the investigator’s role from the role of the attorney who advises the company or defends a later claim. Karin helps you set up those roles before the first interview, so you are not forced into a hard choice later.
A good investigation follows a clear, fair process from start to finish.
Separate the people involved if needed. Any changes should not penalize the employee who complained.
Pick someone impartial, trained, and free of conflicts.
List each allegation, the witnesses, and the records to collect, including texts and chat messages.
Hear the complaining employee, the accused employee, and the witnesses. Give the accused a real chance to respond.
Decide what more likely than not happened, which is the preponderance of the evidence standard. Reach factual findings, not legal conclusions.
Record the allegations, the evidence, credibility assessments, and the findings.
Take appropriate action, tell the parties the outcome as appropriate, and watch for retaliation.
The quality of the process often matters more than the outcome of the findings.
Your written complaint procedure should match how you actually investigate. An employee handbook attorney in San Diego can align the two so your policy supports your process.
You can keep an investigation confidential to the extent possible, but you cannot promise complete confidentiality. Tell the parties that information will be shared only with people who need it.
Be careful with blanket gag orders. Broad, automatic orders telling every witness never to discuss the matter can raise issues under federal labor law. Tailor any instruction to the case.
Retaliation is the risk that grows during an investigation. California protects employees who report suspected violations to someone with authority to investigate, and FEHA protects witnesses too. Treat everyone involved with steady, documented consistency, and review these ways to prevent retaliation claims. If a claim still follows, a retaliation defense attorney in San Diego can use your investigation record to defend it.
The investigation is only useful if your next step fits the evidence. Discipline should match the findings and the way you have handled similar cases.
When an employee can be fired only for good cause, California courts ask whether the employer acted in good faith, after an appropriate investigation, with reasonable grounds to believe the misconduct happened. The employer does not have to prove the misconduct beyond doubt. That standard rewards a careful process. This guide on terminating an employee in California covers the final steps.
Expect requests for records. California employees can request their personnel files, and employers must generally provide them within 30 days of a written request. Organize investigation files with counsel’s guidance.
Karin reviews the investigation and the record, then helps you choose discipline and next steps that fit the evidence.
Karin can step in as the impartial investigator, or she can advise your team while someone else investigates. On the first call, she helps you choose the role that fits the complaint and how you may need to use the findings later.
She assesses the complaint, the urgency, and any interim steps.
She confirms who investigates and how privilege will work, so the process stays impartial and defensible.
As the investigator, she interviews the complaining employee, the accused employee, and witnesses, and gathers documents and messages.
She weighs the evidence, assesses credibility, and delivers a written report with factual findings under the preponderance standard.
When your HR team or another investigator leads, she reviews the plan, the interviews, and the report for fairness and completeness.
She explains how her role in the investigation affects who should advise on discipline or defend a later claim. This overview of what to do when a harassment complaint becomes a claim explains that stage, including any CRD complaint defense that may follow.
Investigations involve your people, your reputation, and your legal position at the same time. Experience matters.
Karin teaches employers and HR teams how to conduct internal investigations. She brings that same process to your matter.
Karin teaches courses for the Human Resources Certification Institute, so she speaks the same language as your HR team. Learn about Karin's experience representing employers.
Karin has litigated more than 500 employment cases. She knows how plaintiffs' lawyers attack investigations and builds yours to withstand that review.
Sensitive complaints call for quiet, careful handling. Karin provides workplace investigation counsel in Old Town San Diego for employers across California.
A workplace investigation is a fact-finding process an employer uses to respond to a complaint or suspected misconduct. An impartial investigator interviews the people involved, reviews documents, and decides what more likely than not happened. The employer then uses those findings to decide what action to take.
Yes. Karin conducts impartial workplace investigations as an attorney, which also meets California's licensing rules for outside investigators. She can also advise your HR team when you investigate internally.
In practice, yes. FEHA requires employers to take all reasonable steps to prevent harassment, and CRD regulations call for a fair, timely, and thorough investigation of complaints. Skipping or delaying one increases your liability risk.
Yes, when the HR investigator is trained, impartial, and not involved in the events. Complaints against senior leaders or HR itself usually call for an outside attorney or licensed investigator.
Generally, yes. Outside investigators must be licensed private investigators or attorneys acting as attorneys. The CRD's Harassment Prevention Guide for employers confirms this point.
It depends on the number of allegations and witnesses. Simple complaints may take days. Complex cases can take several weeks. The law expects a timely process, so delays need a reason.
It can be, depending on how the investigation is set up and how you use it later. Relying on the report as a defense can waive privilege, so plan the structure with counsel at the start.
Sometimes. Paid administrative leave can protect the process and the people involved. Avoid steps that look like punishment before the findings, and never penalize the employee who complained.
Talk to Karin before the first interview. She will help you protect the people involved, the evidence, and your legal position.
